Sunday, March 16, 2014

Muskets and Tomahawks Campaign Tournament Results

We had 8 players for the Muskets and Tomahawk Themed Tournament at Cold Wars.  I want to thank Loyalhanna Outpost and Architects of War for sponsoring the tournament with prize support.  Please visit their websites linked to their names in the sentence above.

 Here is the breakdown of the players, their force alignment and final scores.  A max of 6 points was available for each of the three rounds.  3 points for accomplishing the round's objective, 2 points for accomplishing your subplot and 1 point if you prevent your opponent from accomplishing his objective.  Tie breaker for individual tournament champion determined by kills during all three rounds.

French Players
Player                       Character's Name          Total Points       Character's Promotion Points
Nick G                      Squinting Dog                      10                                    Natural Trait
Croft                          Lieut. Fontainbleu                 2                                    1 + Natural Trait
Tim H.                       Lieut. Temps                         9                                    1 + Natural Trait
Kevin S.                     Lieut Chiroc                          9                                    1 + Natural Trait

British Players
Tom M.                     Lieut. Weatherby                   9                                    0
Jeff C.                       Stalking Elk                          10                                   1 + Natural Trait
Matt D.                     Lieut. Dalton                           8                                    Natural Trait
Jeff W.                     Lieut Wiltrout                          8                                    0

As you can see from the above scores we had a tie for first place between Nick and Jeff C.  The tie breaker was number of points of enemy figures killed or routed from the board during the three rounds of tournament play.  Nick took the final honors having eliminated 254 points of enemy during the three rounds compared to only 154 points for Jeff C.  Congratulations to Nick for taking the individual honors. 
Campaign Results.  For those that may not be familiar with the Campaign format of these games please take a look at this Campaign format discussion  French & Indian War Campaign Game Format
Each round of the tournament had an impact on the following round and on the overall Campaign Game.  This tournament reflected the opening year of what would become the French and Indian war and each round was reflective of objectives and sub-plots that would likely characterize the French, British and Indian maneuvers in the Ohio River Valley 1754 on the eve of this great conflict.  The tournament rules can be found here  Ohio River Valley Tournament Rules

Results:
Round 1: Testing the waters: Scouting Objective vs Scouting Objective.
French Points:  13  (A French victory by a narrow margin)
British Points:  12
 
Round 2: War Begins – Raid!: Raid Objective vs Defense Objective. French players may choose objective and table edge due to winning the scouting round.  Three French players chose Defense and one chose Raid as their objectives.
French  Points: 14 (a resounding French victory)
British Points:    4

Round 3: It’s time to battle: Engagement vs Engagement.  French are still in the lead for the Campaign and may choose the table edge and whether or not to deploy first or second.
French Points:    3
British Points:  19 (a major British victory)

Here is what the campaign game overall situation looks like leading into the next round.

The British lead the overall campaign with a total of 42 points. (35+7)
 The British team came back in the last round with an overwhelming victory that propelled them to 35 points for the tournament.  This meant they not only surpassed the French in victory points for the last round but also for the entire tournament.  So despite narrowly losing the scouting battle in round one and failing to successfully raid the French settlements in round two, the British thoroughly trounced the French in open engagement during round three with three of the four British players meeting their Engagement Victory conditions but also three of the four British players  accomplished their subplot.  This gives the British team an additional 7 victory points for the Ohio River Valley Campaign.  Thus the British lead in Campaign points 42 to 30 in the overall scheme of the campaign.  Next up is 1755  Battle of the Wilderness  225-230 point forces, Traits can be bought using promotion points earned in the Ohio River Valley Campaign (does not count against force point total).  The Wilderness Campaign is worth 10 Campaign Points to the side that is declared the overall victor.  Plan is to play this round of the Campaign during HISTORICON.

Here is a great battle report from Kevin S. and the exploits of Lt Jacques Chiroc.  Lt Chiroc in the Ohio River Valley 1754  Really great Battle Report.  Thanks Kevin.

Some pictures from the tournament.

Pennsylvania Militia during round 1 trying to scout the woods are ambushed by an Indian scouting party.  The militia are quickly routed.


French Regulars surrounded by hidden movement markers during the scouting round. Where is that Chasseur Company when you need it?  Do they hold their ground or take the initiative?  What would you do?


   French Provincials move through a settlement as they prepare to defend against the British raid in round 2 on the "Fall Board".  British Light Infantry are about to emerge from the woods on the other side of the stream.


Coureurs des Bois (in the foreground) move towards an orchard to secure the right flank of the provincials as they defend in round two against British Light Infantry Raid.


British Militia Raiding party successfully lights a cabin on fire just before they are attacked by an Indian force allied with the French.  Here we see Lt Thomas Weatherby (mounted) trying to rally the militia after taking devastating losses from the Indian Ambush as he brings up a supporting unit of militia.

On the Winter board, French Provincials lay in ambush defending the Indian camp as they wait for Jeff C's Indian  raiding party during round 2. 


The British had a hard time with the Raid Objective in round two.  There were some successes as seen in the picture above.  Just not enough to make a difference and complete the objective. 

The Engagement vs Engagement in round three caused much action on all four boards.  Here we see some heavy fighting in the densely forested board on one of the Spring/Summer boards.

All in all a great time had by all.  Thanks for everyone who helped set up and tear down. 





13 comments:

  1. This is a very good advert for these rules and I'm sorely tempted to buy them. I just can't really afford the time for yet another project, though :-( .

    That Lieut. Fontainbleu had a rough time, didn't he :-) ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lt Fontainbleu took French Regulars into the wilderness without irregulars or lights to do his scouting for him. At 200 points it's very difficult to field a decent regular force. To Croft's credit he borrowed that army from me for the tournament, so it probably more a reflection of my poor army building skills than his. Lots of lessons learned in this tournament.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Those were some beautiful boards.
    and people say tournament boards are usually dull(:

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. I would agree that most of the time tournament boards are dull. But my goal is to change that. The visual appeal of this hobby is what most of us are attracted to. It is not that much more effort to put on a visually inspiring event. I have some great ideas for how I want to continue to put on "events" and not just a tournament.

      Delete
  4. Nice post, I bookmark your blog because I found very good information on your blog, Thanks for sharing more information Quality Services & Training Pvt.Ltd.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. I am glad you find my blog helps. I will continue to share what I do. Let me know if you have questions.

      Delete
  5. Hi Tom
    I am keen to learn more about your global campaign. Regardless, I am currently in discussions with a mate to see how fast we can play the 3 games.
    Owen

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Email me at keegantdad@yahoo.com and I will send you the info you need. 200 point games go pretty quick.

      Delete
    2. Email sent, 200 point games are murderously fast. Owen

      Delete
    3. Indeed. Murderously is the key word if things go wrong. Lol

      Delete
  6. Some beautiful tables and figures there. I've always liked this period, without actually taking the plunge and getting into it myself. This could tip me over the edge! Cheers, Paul.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Paul,
      Thanks for the comments. I was enamored by the period but the rules captured and inspired me. Muskets and Tomahawks is an excellent set of rules. They are simple and elegant yet mastering the tactics of the period feels very correct. I highly recommend both the period and these rules.

      Delete